Synopsis

Source of validity: Scientific
Rating (out of 5): 3

Several botanicals have been studied for their potential role in managing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), with the most well-known being Sabal serrulata (saw palmetto), Pygeum africanum (African plum), and Urtica dioica (stinging nettle). The use of these botanicals has roots in traditional medicine, but their application in BPH has also been investigated in scientific studies. For saw palmetto, multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have yielded mixed results. Some studies suggest modest improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary flow measures, while others show no significant difference from placebo. Pygeum africanum and stinging nettle extracts have also demonstrated potential benefits in some clinical trials, primarily related to symptom relief rather than halting disease progression.

However, the overall quality of evidence is moderate at best, with methodological limitations in many studies, including small sample sizes, short durations, and inconsistent product formulations. Systematic reviews (e.g., Cochrane) generally conclude that while these botanicals may offer mild symptom relief for some men, they are less effective than conventional medications like alpha-blockers or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Thus, the scientific evidence supporting botanicals for BPH is present but not robust, justifying a moderate (3/5) evidence rating. Clinicians should discuss the limited efficacy and potential side effects with patients considering botanical therapies for BPH.

More about botanical (unspecified)
More about Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Other ingredients used for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Other health conditions supported by botanical (unspecified)

Products containing botanical (unspecified)