Picky Eater Nutrition

Picky Eater Nutrition: A Comprehensive Reference

1. Definition and Overview

Picky eating in children is a collective term that usually denotes having strong food preferences, consuming an inadequate variety of foods, restricting the intake of some food groups, eating a limited amount of food, or being unwilling to try new foods. There is no specific medical definition for the term "picky eater." In the nutrition and public health literature, it is also referred to as fussy eating, selective eating, faddy eating, and choosy eating — a complex behavior that broadly refers to a combination of traits.

The interpretation of picky eating in the pediatric population is challenged by a lack of unified terminology across the literature. Studies alternately refer to food neophobia, selective eating, sensory-based avoidance, or restrictive feeding behaviors, often without clear operational distinctions. These discrepancies contribute to the wide prevalence range reported globally, as different constructs capture overlapping but not identical behaviors.

There is no agreement on a formal definition of picky eating, although it is generally accepted to include rejection or restriction of familiar foods and unfamiliar foods, and thus including an element of neophobia. There are a variety of tools used for the assessment of picky eating and consequently there is a wide range of prevalence reported. The "causes" and "consequences" of picky eating are not well understood because of these inconsistencies and because of heterogeneity in study designs. This is further compounded by a lack of longitudinal observational data, with most studies using only cross-sectional data.

2. Prevalence and Natural Course

Prevalence estimates of picky eating vary widely (13–50%), with peak incidence between ages two and six. In a recent study involving 4,018 participants conducted in the Netherlands, the prevalence of picky eating was 26.5% at 18 months of age, 27.6% at 3 years of age, and declined to 13.2% at 6 years of age. The data from that study suggest that picky eating is usually a temporary behavior and is a part of normal development in preschool children.

In one study, 20–60% of young children were reported by their parents not to be eating optimally. Another study of 120 children aged 2–11 years identified 39% as picky eaters, and picky eating prevalence as high as 50% was reported in children aged 19–24 months in a study carried out in North America.

Despite the general trend toward resolution, persistence has been documented in a subset: children with picky eating identified at 24 months were more likely to be picky at the next time point than if the picky eating was newly incident at a later time point, suggesting that early picky eating behaviour is more persistent. The prevalence of picky eating was moderately stable between age 4 and 6 years in a group of Norwegian children, with 50% being picky at both ages. Some studies have shown the prevalence to be stable beyond the age of 3 years, even up to age 11 years.

3. Presentation and Behavioral Features

Picky eating includes behaviors such as limited dietary variety, neophobia, food refusals, and sensory sensitivities, and can be a source of stress for families. Common presentations include rejection of vegetables, fruits, meats, and mixed-texture dishes, a preference for carbohydrate-dense or processed foods, and strong resistance to trying new foods.

A cross-sectional analysis in the United Kingdom, based on questionnaires completed by parents when their children were aged 30 months, indicated that eating a limited variety (17%) and preferring drinks to food (13%) were the most prevalent problem behaviors. Excessive milk-drinking was also identified as a common picky-eating behavior; based on food records, excessive milk-drinking may induce low appetite at meal-times and cause inadequate energy intake.

Picky eating can occur in normally developing children as well as in those with medical or developmental disorders, and eating disorders in adolescence and early adulthood can sometimes trace back to picky eating in early childhood.

3.1 Relationship to ARFID

Picky eating exists on a spectrum. At its more severe end, it overlaps with the clinical diagnosis of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID). ARFID characterized by sensory sensitivity is defined by an avoidance of specific types of foods because of their sensory features, such as taste, texture, smell, temperature, color, or brand. Individuals with this presentation of ARFID are those most likely to be described as picky eaters. People with this presentation of ARFID may eat few total foods and may exclude entire food groups from their diet.

Picky eaters with ARFID symptoms show greater food neophobia and eating inflexibility, and are more likely to eat from a narrow range of foods compared to picky eaters without ARFID. Adult picky eaters can be differentiated from those with symptoms of anorexia and bulimia by their stronger endorsement of food neophobia and inflexible eating behaviors, and by eating from a very narrow range of foods. Picky eaters with ARFID symptoms can be differentiated from picky eaters without these symptoms on the basis of these three eating behaviors, and by their higher endorsement of internalizing distress, OCD symptoms, and eating-related quality of life impairment.

4. Body Systems Involved

4.1 Gustatory and Sensory Systems

The sensory system — particularly gustatory (taste), olfactory (smell), and tactile (oral texture) perception — plays a central role in food acceptance. Children who preferred softer and non-particulate versions of foods were found to be more neophobic and sensory sensitive across all sensory domains. Some studies have supported the assumption that higher sensitivity to touch contributes to picky eating. A group of children clinically diagnosed with tactile defensiveness rejected more foods, ate fewer vegetables, and refused more often to eat new foods compared to healthy children.

Research has linked picky eating with heightened sensory sensitivity (both global and taste specific) and with an increased likelihood of being a "supertaster" — defined as a person who has a higher density of taste buds on the tongue and who can taste a bitter chemical called 6-N-propylthiouracil.

4.2 Gastrointestinal System

The communication between microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract and the brain — the so-called microbiota-gut-brain axis — has been implicated in the pathophysiology of eating disorders. A 2024 review sought to investigate and conceptualize the possible ways that the microbiota-gut-brain axis is involved in ARFID. The gut microbiota composition and diversity in children with ARFID were different from those in healthy children. Children with ARFID who consumed a greater variety of foods during childhood would be expected to have a more diverse gut microbiota and therefore less severity of symptoms. The addition of psychosocial stressors during these critical periods of development could exacerbate symptom development.

4.3 Neurological and Cognitive Systems

The link between micronutrient deficiency and neurobehavioral disorders is increasingly established and is worrying even in Western countries. Inadequate intake of iron, zinc, and other micronutrients in early childhood — risks heightened in picky eaters — can have neurological consequences. Certain studies indicate that nutrition during early childhood has long-lasting impacts on the intelligence of children.

4.4 Musculoskeletal and Growth Systems

Behavioral feeding disorders may be associated with suboptimal development, and some children who refuse food or are picky have poor weight gain. The "refusal of some food groups" was related to lower height-for-age among children aged 4 to 5 years. This suggests the necessity for further investigation of long-term problems induced by food avoidance, in terms of the negative influence of micronutrient deficiency on linear growth.

5. Contributing and Associated Factors

5.1 Genetic Factors

There is evidence to suggest that there is a genetic component to picky eating and food preferences. Research studies have shown that genetics can influence a child's taste preferences, development of food neophobia, and sensitivity to certain tastes or textures. Some studies have estimated that genetic factors account for around 40–70% of the variation in food neophobia, while others suggest that genetics may explain around 40–50% of the variation in taste preferences.

Results indicated that food fussiness and fruit and vegetable liking share common genetic factors. A study done with 8–11-year-old twins investigated the influence of genes and environmental factors on variation in food neophobia. Genetic differences explained 78% of the variation in food neophobia scores, while 22% was explained by environmental factors specific to the individual.

5.2 Sensory Sensitivity and Temperament

Prevalence estimates of picky eating vary widely (13–50%), with peak incidence between ages two and six. Contributing factors include genetic predisposition, sensory sensitivities, temperament, family feeding practices, environmental influences, and adverse feeding experiences.

Attention has been given to other factors that may also explain persistent and severe food avoidance observed among individuals with sensory sensitivity, including food neophobia, disgust sensitivity, and cognitive rigidity.

5.3 Early Feeding Practices and Prenatal Flavor Exposure

Environmental factors play a role in taste and eating preferences. Flavors from aromatic compounds derived from maternal food consumption are transmitted into the amniotic fluid and breast milk; these flavors have strong influences in taste preferences and food acceptance later in life. An experimental study demonstrated that infants of mothers who drank carrot juice during the last trimester of pregnancy enjoyed carrot-flavored cereals more than infants whose mothers did not drink carrot juice or eat carrots.

Children who are exposed to greater food variety early in life have more varied diets in later childhood and adolescence, an effect that seems to be particularly pronounced for vegetable acceptance. Repeated exposure to a variety of foods and textures during the "sensitive period" for introduction to solid foods, between four to five months of age, is thought to promote food acceptance later.

5.4 Parental and Family Influences

Parents who are picky eaters might expose their children to a limited variety of flavors during pregnancy and early childhood by eating a narrow diet during pregnancy and/or feeding their child from the parents' own narrow range of preferred foods. Caregivers who are picky or neophobic themselves might be more likely to conclude from developmentally appropriate displays of infant food neophobia that their child dislikes a food, and stop offering it.

Parents who are anxious or sensitive to sensory stimuli might be more aware of, and/or distressed by, their young children's facial reactions to novel food. In one longitudinal study, parental sensitivity to children's emotional reactions to feeding predicted the persistence of picky eating from age 4 to 6.

5.5 Neurodevelopmental Conditions

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which is a neurodevelopmental disorder, is characterized by social and behavioral challenges that include extreme food selectivity. As many as 89% of children with ASD have restricted diets and often reject food groups, especially vegetables and fruits, preferring processed and calorie-dense foods.

5.6 Psychosocial and Environmental Factors

The onset of food neophobia can be determined by a combination of biological, psychological, and environmental factors, which include various genetic conditions, individual personality predispositions, the level of the child's familiarity with the taste, the moment and method of introducing new products, and parents' attitude towards food.

6. Nutritional Consequences

6.1 Macronutrient Intake

There were no significant differences in energy intakes between picky eaters and non-picky eaters, and intakes were adequate relative to estimated average requirements. Nutrient differences were explained by lower intakes of meat, fish, vegetables, and fruits in picky eaters than in nonpicky eaters. There were higher intakes of sugary foods and drinks in older picky eaters.

6.2 Micronutrient Deficiencies

Picky eaters aged 3 years had lower mean carotene, iron, and zinc intakes than nonpicky eaters. There were similar differences between the longitudinally defined picky eater groups. Iron and zinc intakes were most likely to be below recommended amounts, with free sugar intake much higher than recommended.

Studies show that picky eater children may have deficient micronutrient intake. One prospective controlled clinical trial found a high prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake in both picky and non-picky eating groups at baseline, including vitamins D, C, iron, and folate. A separate study that interviewed 118 mothers of picky eater children between 24 and 36 months of age found a high prevalence of calcium, zinc, and vitamin D and E deficiency, along with extremely low dietary variety.

In one cross-sectional study of 321 school-aged children (7–10 years), the picky eating group consumed significantly less protein, folate, magnesium, potassium, zinc, and vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, D, and E than the non-picky eating group.

Pediatric individuals are prone to imbalanced diets and picky eating behaviour, and their diets may then become incomplete; the highest risk for deficiency is observed for iron, zinc, and vitamin D.

Although, in some studies, picky eaters had lower intakes of certain vitamins and minerals, the levels consumed generally exceeded the recommended values, suggesting nutritional requirements are being met. This important qualification highlights the heterogeneity of outcomes and the need to assess individual children rather than drawing universal conclusions.

7. Key Nutrients in Relation to Picky Eating

7.1 Zinc

Scientific evidence: Zinc occupies a particularly significant place in the nutrition of picky eaters because of its bidirectional relationship with food intake. Zinc deficiency causes diarrhea, slow growth, and loss of appetite in infants and children. Zinc deficiency at any age can cause a loss of taste and smell. This impairment in sensory perception can itself reinforce food selectivity, potentially creating a self-perpetuating cycle.

In multivariate analysis, zinc deficiency was independently related to picky eating (OR = 2.124, p = 0.037, CI = 1.042–4.312), developmental level, and physical activity level. The prevalence of zinc deficiency in children aged 4–7 was high, especially in picky eaters. Zinc deficiency was significantly associated with low development and poor physical activity in early childhood.

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in PMC examined zinc supplementation for taste disorders. Zinc supplementation was found to be an effective treatment for taste disorders in patients with zinc deficiency, idiopathic taste disorders, and in patients with taste disorders induced by chronic renal failure, when given in high doses ranging from 68 to 86.7 mg/d for up to six months. Evidence quality for chronic renal failure populations was rated low due to small sample sizes; evidence for idiopathic taste disorders was more robust.

Zinc deficiency is characterized by growth retardation, loss of appetite, and impaired immune function. In more severe cases, zinc deficiency causes hair loss, diarrhea, delayed sexual maturation, impotence, hypogonadism in males, and eye and skin lesions.

7.2 Iron

Scientific evidence: Iron deficiency is among the most studied micronutrient concerns in picky eaters. Iron deficiency is the most common nutritional deficiency in children, who are at particular risk for developing it due to their rapid growth and the use of complementary foods with low bioavailable iron content. Signs of iron deficiency include pallor, poor appetite, irritability, and slowed growth and development.

Within the protein group, poultry and meats provide rich sources of niacin and zinc, while seafoods are rich in omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Meat, poultry, and seafoods are also sources of heme iron, which is more bioavailable than the non-heme iron present in plant proteins. Picky eaters who avoid meat, poultry, and seafood are therefore at compounded risk for iron inadequacy.

In a review of children with autism spectrum disorder and associated picky eating, researchers identified 44 cases discussed in 27 studies and found that deficiencies in vitamins A, B, and D, as well as iron and calcium, are most common.

A prospective clinical trial of oral nutritional supplementation in picky-eating preschoolers found that in the intervention group, the intake of iron and vitamins C, D, and B12 was higher over time (p < 0.05) when compared to baseline.

7.3 Vitamin D

Scientific evidence: Vitamin D deficiency among children with ASD has been well-studied and documented, in part due to its routine testing in clinical practice. In picky eaters more broadly, vitamin D insufficiency is a recurring finding given the narrow range of dietary sources (fatty fish, fortified dairy). Milk is a poor source of iron, zinc, vitamin D, and vitamin A, all of which are essential for the maintenance of normal growth and function, making adequacy dependent on variety in complementary foods — variety that picky eaters characteristically lack.

In one randomized double-blind clinical trial of oral nutritional supplementation in picky-eating children at nutritional risk in India, the proportions of children with adequate nutrient intakes increased significantly at Day 90 in the supplemented groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05), especially for total fat, calcium, vitamin A, vitamin C, and thiamin. Vitamin D intake was among the nutrients showing the most consistent inadequacy at baseline.

7.4 Vitamin A and Carotenoids

Scientific evidence: Picky eaters aged 3 years had lower mean carotene intake than nonpicky eaters in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), a large UK observational cohort. The lower carotenoid intake reflects the well-documented avoidance of vegetables and fruits — principal sources of beta-carotene — in picky eaters. The evidence for dietary effects of picky eating is inconclusive, with the exception of a lower intake of vegetables in picky eaters, which is a frequent finding.

7.5 Omega-3 Fatty Acids (EPA and DHA)

Scientific evidence: Seafoods are rich in omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Picky eaters who avoid fish and seafood are at elevated risk for insufficient omega-3 intake. Omega-3 deficiency in the context of picky eating has been flagged in pediatric nutritional assessments, though controlled trials specifically targeting omega-3 supplementation in picky eaters (as distinct from the general pediatric or ASD population) remain limited. Fatty fish is a good source of the omega-3 fats EPA and DHA. The optimal amount of EPA and DHA for infants and young children has not been determined.

7.6 Calcium and Fiber

Scientific evidence: Median intakes of calcium, fiber, folate, magnesium, potassium, vitamins A, D, E, and K, and zinc were significantly lower than reference standards in a cross-sectional study of school-age children, among both picky and non-picky eaters, though the deficits were more pronounced in picky eaters. Children with neophobic behavior consumed less dietary fiber per 1000 kcal of energy intake than their counterparts.

7.7 B Vitamins (Including Folate and B12)

Scientific evidence: One prospective clinical trial found a high prevalence of inadequate folate intake at baseline in a picky-eating preschooler population. Vitamin B12, found primarily in animal products, is a nutrient at risk in children who avoid meat, fish, and dairy. In the intervention group of the same trial, the intake of vitamins C, D, and B12 was higher over time (p < 0.05) in the supplemented group compared to baseline.

8. Oral Nutritional Supplementation: Scientific Evidence

Recognizing the micronutrient gaps common in picky eaters, several clinical trials have evaluated oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) as an adjunct to dietary counseling.

A randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial from Brazil enrolled picky-eating children aged 24 to 60 months. This was a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial that included Brazilian picky eater children aged 24 to 60 months. The individuals were randomized into a control group (n = 17) and an intervention group (n = 18), and were followed up for 180 days. The control group received nutritional guidance for food selectivity, while the intervention group received the same guidance plus oral nutritional supplementation. In the follow-up, in the intervention group, the intake of iron and vitamins C, D, and B12 was higher over time (p < 0.05) when compared to baseline.

A larger multi-center randomized double-blinded study conducted in India enrolled picky-eating children between 24 and 48 months. Supplements increased nutrient adequacy in both supplemented groups relative to control (p < 0.05). The proportions of children with adequate nutrient intakes increased significantly at Day 90 in the supplemented groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05), especially for total fat, calcium, vitamin A, vitamin C, and thiamin.

Clinical experiences on the effect of food supplementation on the growth of children with low appetite and selectivity, or whose dietary pattern was monotonous and with inadequate intake of micronutrients, demonstrated an improvement in the general state of health. The use of supplements with adequate energy content and balance in the composition of vitamins and minerals has shown results both in maintaining nutritional status and in improving the situation of specific vitamin deficiencies.

Well-conducted randomized controlled trials confirm that deficiencies can be corrected efficiently including with food fortification, and result in clinical benefits. Individual supplementation should be considered in children and adolescents with proven deficiency.

Overall, the evidence for ONS in picky-eating children is encouraging but limited by small sample sizes, short durations, and heterogeneous populations. Larger, longer-term trials are needed.

9. Traditional Use of Natural Ingredients

In traditional medicine systems worldwide, numerous herbs and natural preparations have historically been employed to stimulate appetite, improve digestion, or encourage food acceptance in children and adults with restricted intake. These uses predate modern nutrition science and are classified below as traditional use only, distinct from clinical evidence.

9.1 Gentian Root (Gentiana lutea)

Traditional use: In European herbal tradition, particularly within the German Commission E and British herbal pharmacopeias, gentian root has been used as a bitter tonic to stimulate appetite and digestive secretions before meals. It was historically prepared as a decoction or alcoholic tincture taken before meals. Its use is documented in the context of loss of appetite and dyspepsia in adults. Scientific evidence: Controlled clinical data specifically addressing gentian root supplementation in picky-eating children or adults are absent in the peer-reviewed literature. The appetite-stimulating mechanism is attributed to its bitter constituents (gentiopicrin, amarogentin) acting on bitter taste receptors, but this mechanistic pathway has not been validated in clinical trials focused on picky eating populations.

9.2 Ginger (Zingiber officinale)

Traditional use: Ginger has been used across Ayurvedic, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and European folk traditions as a digestive aid and appetite stimulant. In Ayurvedic practice, dried ginger (sunthi) was used in formulations to kindle digestive fire (agni) and reduce nausea. Scientific evidence: Research on ginger has predominantly focused on nausea, vomiting, and gastrointestinal motility; evidence specifically relevant to food selectivity or picky eating is not found in the peer-reviewed literature.

9.3 Zinc-Rich Traditional Foods

Traditional use: Across many food cultures, oysters, red meats, seeds, and legumes have long been emphasized as restorative foods for children with poor appetite or slow growth — particularly in West African, Chinese, and South Asian culinary traditions. These foods are naturally high in bioavailable zinc. Scientific relevance: This traditional emphasis aligns with modern evidence that zinc deficiency causes diarrhea, slow growth, and loss of appetite in infants and children, and that zinc deficiency may compound selective eating by dulling taste perception.

10. Dietary and Lifestyle Factors

10.1 Repeated Exposure to Novel Foods

During the transition to table food, most infants display behavioral neophobia to unfamiliar tastes and textures, and acceptance of novel foods increases only with repeated exposures. Parents should be encouraged to keep trying after a food is refused, as children may need to be exposed to a food several times before it is accepted. Varying the preparation changes the taste, texture, and appearance of food, and children may prefer some variants to others.

10.2 Early Dietary Diversity

Children who are exposed to greater food variety early in life have more varied diets in later childhood and adolescence, an effect that seems to be particularly pronounced for vegetable acceptance. This relationship supports early introduction of varied complementary foods as a preventive strategy against long-term picky eating.

10.3 Parental Modeling and Feeding Environment

Parents can influence their children's mealtime behavior through the feeding practices they use when offering foods. The nutrition approach in multi-component intervention studies focused on offering food variety (texture and taste) and repeated neutral exposure to healthy foods. Concurrently, a pleasant feeding environment was fostered, and children were encouraged to eat with their families in more extensive social settings.

10.4 Avoidance of Restrictive or Pressuring Feeding Practices

Some parental practices are counterproductive to establishing healthy eating habits and should be avoided, but caregivers need alternative behaviors to replace them. There is some evidence on the effect of parental feeding practices from randomized control trials. Interventions conducted during the first years of life led to small improvements in some children's eating behaviours.

10.5 Physical Activity

Fear of unfamiliar places, poor physical activity, constipation, and high frequency of medical illness were significantly higher in picky eaters. Whether reduced physical activity is a consequence of poor nutrition from selective eating or an independent contributing factor to the picky eating phenotype requires further investigation.

10.6 Structured Mealtime Environment

In a non-controlling, non-coercive environment, healthy children have the ability to self-regulate the amount of food and energy consumed. Fluctuations in intake are normal and to be expected, as children have appetites that are appropriate for their age and growth rate. Children will eat less on some days and more on other days. Institutional guidelines support structured but non-coercive meals as foundational to healthful intake in young children.

11. Long-term Outcomes and Evidence Gaps

Although often a transient developmental stage, persistent or severe selectivity may lead to nutritional deficiencies, growth impairment, and psychosocial consequences. There may be a small subgroup of children in whom picky eating does not resolve who might be at risk of thinness during adolescence, or of developing an eating disorder or adult picky eating; these children need to be identified at an early age to enable support, monitoring, and advice to be offered to parents.

While most children outgrow picky eating without adverse outcomes, a subset remains at risk of long-term nutritional compromise and psychosocial difficulties. Early recognition, family-centered guidance, and evidence-based interventions are essential.

The field is hampered by the lack of an accepted definition of picky eating amongst researchers and of an accepted and validated method of identification that is used universally, which makes comparing studies and drawing strong conclusions difficult. Most available studies are cross-sectional, and well-powered longitudinal trials examining nutrient-specific interventions in picky eating populations remain few.

References

• van der Horst K. Picky Eating in Children. Nutrients. 2015. PMC4422022.
• Samuel TM et al. A Narrative Review of Childhood Picky Eating and Its Relationship to Food Intakes, Nutritional Status, and Growth. Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1992.
• Brown CL, Perrin EM. Picky eating in children: causes and consequences. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2019. PMC6398579.
• Chang YJ et al. Association of Picky Eating with Growth, Nutritional Status, Development, Physical Activity, and Health in Preschool Children. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2018. PMC5816267.
• Decoding Picky Eating in Children: A Temporary Phase or a Hidden Health Concern? Nutrients. 2025. PMC12736178.
• Taylor CM et al. Macro- and micronutrient intakes in picky eaters: a cause for concern? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2016. PMC5118732.
• Nogueira-de-Almeida CA et al. Clinical Evolution of Preschool Picky Eater Children Receiving Oral Nutritional Supplementation during Six Months. Children. 2023. PMC10047348.
• Effect of Oral Nutritional Supplementation on Adequacy of Nutrient Intake among Picky-Eating Children at Nutritional Risk in India. Nutrients. 2023. PMC10255389.
• Familiari A et al. Considering Nature and Nurture in the Etiology and Prevention of Picky Eating: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020. PMC7694604.
• Food Texture Acceptance, Sensory Sensitivity, and Food Neophobia in Children and Their Parents. Foods. 2021. PMC8535628.
• Association between Picky Eating Behaviors and Nutritional Status in Early Childhood. Nutrients. 2017. PMC5452193.
• Serum Trace Element Levels and Their Correlation with Picky Eating Behavior, Development, and Physical Activity in Early Childhood. PMC8308333.
• NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Zinc: Fact Sheet for Consumers.
• NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Zinc: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
• The Effectiveness of Zinc Supplementation in Taste Disorder Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PMC10017214.
• Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances. PMC11231462.
• A Role for the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A New Conceptual Model. PMC11629072.
• Using 16S rDNA and Metagenomic Sequencing Technology to Analyze the Fecal Microbiome of Children with ARFID. PMC10661725.
• Adult picky eaters with symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. PMC5086050.
• Picky Eating Is Associated with Lower Nutrient Intakes from Children's Home-Packed School Lunches. PMC8224271.
• Dietary Approaches to Iron Deficiency Prevention in Childhood. PMC9026685.
• Micronutrient Deficiency and Supplements in Schoolchildren and Teenagers. PMC11864051.
• Complementary Feeding: Should Baby Be Leading the Way? PMC9303566.
• Interventions for Picky Eaters among Typically Developed Children — A Scoping Review. PMC9824123.
• Parental Feeding Practices and Children's Eating Behaviours: An Overview of Their Complex Relationship. PMC9914567.
• News Medical: Study Shows How Autism-Linked Picky Eating Causes Serious Vitamin Deficiencies. 2025.
• Correlates of picky eating and food neophobia in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews. 2017;75(7):516.